OFFICIAL JUDGE COMMENTARY – Z.EVALUATION OF YOUR CHALLENGE 1 TRACK
The instrumental: The keys are a slow build that pays off. Well done!
Timing: Impressive.
Energy: High.
Emotion: There's a level of self-assured snark here that I want to buy, but you're not completely selling it.
Musicality: I wasn't so sure about your spoken intro, but everything else in this piece falls easily into place.
Creativeness: I think you really shine in the realm of lyrical creativity. There were some moments where you faltered, but you always brought shit back around.
Flow variety: I honestly think you've done a better job mixing up your flow than many of the other cats in this competition. Your double-time was flawless, and your singing added additional depth.
Vocal quality: I think the vocal tracks were, for the most part, clean and clear. There's a little muddying here and there, but nothing that can't be overlooked.
Additional comments: At some point in your career, please incorporate a Wilford Brimley sample. "Diah-beetus."
EVALUATION OF YOUR MUSIC SITE UPDATES
First impression without having to scroll or click through anything: The header image is a little much. In fact, I'm sort of inclined to say the presentation is too busy.
Graphical attractiveness: I don't dislike the images themselves, but there seems to be a little too much going on.
Cohesiveness: I think there's a definite level of cohesion here. It makes a visual statement.
Amount of content: Lots of everything.
Overall professionalism of the sites: Not perfectly professional, but definitely a step in the right direction as opposed to a bare-bones artist page.
Additional comments: None. I have said my piece.

